Humanity, Resilience, and Equity in Corporate Failure: A Literature Review on Developing Fairness Metrics for Inclusive Insolvency Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbge.v3i2.459Keywords:
corporate insolvency, fairness metrics, stakeholder vulnerability, institutional resilience, distributive equityAbstract
Corporate insolvency regimes have long been designed around efficiency, creditor recovery, and procedural certainty, frequently marginalizing the human, social, and distributive consequences of corporate failure. This qualitative literature review seeks to reconceptualize insolvency as a multidimensional institutional process by integrating the principles of humanity, resilience, and equity, with the objective of developing fairness metrics for more inclusive insolvency systems. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship from insolvency law, corporate governance, economic sociology, and normative political theory, this study systematically synthesizes peer reviewed literature published between 2000 and 2024 using a structured qualitative thematic analysis.
The review identifies three interrelated dimensions shaping inclusive insolvency outcomes. First, humanity-oriented approaches emphasize stakeholder vulnerability, dignity preservation, and procedural justice, particularly for employees, involuntary creditors, small suppliers, and local communities affected by corporate collapse. Second, resilience based perspectives frame insolvency not merely as an endpoint of failure but as an adaptive governance mechanism that enables organizational recovery, institutional learning, and broader systemic stability. Third, equity focused frameworks highlight the importance of proportional and context sensitive loss allocation, stakeholder participation, and intertemporal fairness in distributing the economic and social costs of insolvency.
By integrating these dimensions, the study develops a conceptual framework of fairness metrics that extends beyond traditional efficiency-driven indicators, offering normative and analytical tools for evaluating insolvency systems in a more holistic manner. The findings contribute to insolvency scholarship by bridging fragmented theoretical strands and advancing a human-centered and resilience oriented understanding of corporate failure. The review further suggests that insolvency regimes embedding humanity, resilience, and equity are more likely to enhance institutional legitimacy, stakeholder trust, and long term economic sustainability, thereby providing a robust foundation for future empirical research and policy reform.
References
Ali, S., Jiang, H., & Li, Z. (2021). Corporate governance and insolvency risk: Evidence from financial institutions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Aziz, T., Taqi, M., & Ali, M. S. (2021). Sustainability and insolvency law: Integrating environmental and social risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128531
Baird, D. G., & Rasmussen, R. K. (2010). Antibankruptcy. Yale Law Journal, 119(4), 648–699.
Bishop, J. D. (2008). For-profit corporations in a just society: A social contract argument concerning the rights and responsibilities of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818216
Blair, M. (1999). Firm-specific human capital and theories of the firm. In M. Blair & M. Roe (Eds.), Employees and corporate governance (pp. 58–90). Brookings Institution Press.
Boon, G. (2018). Harmonising European insolvency law: The emerging role of stakeholders. European Business Organization Law Review, 19(3), 573–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0114-6
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Britannica. (n.d.). Code of Hammurabi. Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Brown, P. (2018). Environmental obligations in insolvency proceedings. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy019
Buccola, V., & Macey, J. R. (2021). Claim durability and bankruptcy value. University of Chicago Law Review, 88(6), 1345–1396.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Department of the Environment. (1983). Paying for pollution: The polluter pays principle. HMSO.
Dragstedt, A. (1976). Value theory and social labor. Review of Radical Political Economics, 8(2), 1–17.
Ehmke, C., & Vaccari, E. (2023). Environmental liability and insolvency: Insurance-based approaches. Journal of Environmental Law, 35(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad004
Evju, S. (2013). Labour is not a commodity. European Labour Law Journal, 4(4), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/201395251300400401
Finch, V. (2008). Corporate insolvency law: Perspectives and principles (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Finch, V. (2008). Corporate rescue in a world of debt. Journal of Business Law, 756–783.
Fineman, M. (2008). The vulnerable subject. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20, 1–23.
Fineman, M. (2017). Vulnerability and inevitable inequality. Oslo Law Review, 4(3), 133–149.
Fineman, M. (2022). Rights, resilience, and responsibility. Emory Law Journal, 71, 1435–1474.
Fineman, M. A. (2005). The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New Press.
Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
Fineman, M. A. (2017). Vulnerability and inevitable inequality. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 55(3), 133–149.
Fineman, M. A. (2020). The vulnerable subject: The politics of resilience. Oxford University Press.
Fineman, M. A. (2022). Just equality: Equality, justice, and the vulnerable subject. Oxford University Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2018). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280
Gant, J. (2022). Floating charges and vulnerability in insolvency law. Modern Law Review, 85(3), 593–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12715
Gant, J. (2023). Vulnerability, power, and insolvency. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 43(4), 897–924. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqad022
Gant, J. (2025). Vulnerability theory and insolvency law. Legal Studies (Advance online publication).
Gant, J. L. L. (2025). Power, choice, exposure and fragility. International Insolvency Review, 34(2), 302–336.
Ghio, A., Mazzola, P., & Zampone, G. (2021). Stakeholder involvement in European restructuring law. European Business Organization Law Review, 22(2), 311–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00205-5
Goode, R. (2005). Principles of corporate insolvency law (3rd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The first 5,000 years. Melville House.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Greenhalgh, T., Peacock, R., & Wong, G. (2018). Realist approaches to evidence synthesis. BMJ, 362, k3539.
Gross, K. (1994). Failure and forgiveness: Rebalancing the bankruptcy system. Yale University Press.
Gurrea-Martínez, A. (2020). Insolvency law in times of COVID-19. European Company and Financial Law Review, 17(3), 233–255.
Harahap, S., Hermanu, D. H., Sugiharti, T., & Ruslaini. (2022). Lombok Teachers and Principals Building Resilience in Facing Earthquakes and Covid-19 Pandemic. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 153-163. ISSN 2621-5799 DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.477
Harris, R. (2000). Industrializing English law. Cambridge University Press.
Haucap, J., & Heimeshoff, U. (2013). Competition policy and inequality. Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-012-9211-4
Hsieh, N., Meyer, M., Rodin, D., & van ’t Klooster, J. (2018). The social purpose of corporations. Journal of the British Academy, 6(s1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006s1.049
Irawan, D., Prabowo, H., Kuncoro, E.A., Thoha, N., (2021). The Moderating Role of Human Capital on the Operational Resilience and Strategic Orientation to Corporate Sustainable Longevity through Innovation Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Jamu Companies. Psychology and Education Journal. Vol. 58 No. 4 (2021): Volume 58 No. 4 (2021).
Jesson, J. K., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE.
Keay, A., & de Prez, J. (2001). Environmental liabilities in insolvency. Journal of Business Law, 6, 459–485.
Keister, L. A. (2014). The one percent. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043439
Kornhauser, L. A., & Revesz, R. L. (1994). Apportioning damages among insolvent defendants. University of Chicago Law Review, 61(2), 523–563.
Linna, T. (2019). Sustainability and insolvency law. International Insolvency Review, 28(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1347
Linna, T. (2020). Corporate restructuring and environmental responsibility. European Business Law Review, 31(4), 601–623.
Marx, K. (1963). The poverty of philosophy. International Publishers.
McKenzie, R. (2012). Mass tort bankruptcies. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 86(2), 211–258.
McLean, B. (2003). Transnational corporations and social responsibility. World Economy, 26(6), 839–864.
Mohan, A., & Prasad, S. (2023). Environmental creditors in insolvency. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 23(1), 87–114.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2154871
Mucciarelli, F. M. (2017). Employee protection in insolvency law. European Company Law, 14(1), 10–17.
Omar, P. (2004). International insolvency law. Ashgate.
Parikh, M. (2022). Bankruptcy manipulation and mass torts. Texas Law Review, 101, 45–98.
Parkinson, J. (2018). Corporate governance, insolvency, and risk-taking. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 18(1), 1–34.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2018.1426887
Pfeffer, F., & Waitkus, N. (2021). The wealth inequality of nations. American Sociological Review, 86(4), 567–602.
Posner, R. A. (2010). The crisis of capitalist democracy. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Belknap Press.
Reich, R. (2015). Saving capitalism. Knopf.
Rich, J. C., & Wilson, J. J. (1977). The industrial revolution in law. McGraw-Hill.
Roe, M. J. (1984). Bankruptcy and mass torts. Columbia Law Review, 84(4), 846–895.
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What money can’t buy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Schytzer, A., Welsh, M., & Aulich, C. (2024). Insolvent polluters and intergenerational justice. Journal of Environmental Law, 36(1), 1–28.
Simon, J. (2022). The bankruptcy trust problem. Harvard Law Review, 135, 1648–1710.
Smith, A. (2008). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1776)
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sugiharti, T. (2023). Sustainable leadership best practices in enhancing business resilience and performance of robusta coffee farmers. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED), 5(Special-Issue-2), 387–401.
https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v5iSpecial-Issue-2.8051
Sykes, A. O. (2001). Subrogation and insolvency. Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 383–406.
Thoha, N., Fauzi, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2021). Operational resilience and human capital: Toward corporate sustainable longevity in Indonesian Jamu industry. In International Conference on Business, Economics and Sustainable Development (ICBESD 2020) (pp. 51-58). Springer, Singapore.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tomasic, R. (2009). Corporate rescue and social justice. Journal of Business Law, 5, 343–368.
Vaccari, E., & Van Ho, T. (2023). Insolvency law through the lens of human rights theories. In E. Ghio et al. (Eds.), Re-examining insolvency law and theory. Edward Elgar.
Vaughan, S., & Kerr, M. (2024). Legal institutions and inequality. Modern Law Review, 87(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12855
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
Wu, T. (2024). Strategic bankruptcy and regulatory arbitrage. Yale Law Journal, 133(2), 455–512.
